Heating & Cooling for Passive Houses and High-Performance Homes
Choosing the right system — everything a homeowner, architect or builder needs to know before deciding how to heat and cool a well-sealed, well-insulated home.
Airtightness and MVHR solve the envelope and the air. The question that follows almost every conversation about a Passive House or high-performance home is simpler: so how do I actually heat and cool it? This guide covers the mindset shift that catches most Australians out, why sizing matters more than brand or system type, and an honest look at split systems, bulkheads, hydronic heating, ducted reverse-cycle and evaporative cooling — including why the last one doesn’t suit an airtight home.
19 min read
Key takeaways
- High-performance homes have far smaller heating and cooling loads than typical Australian houses — sizing a new system like your old one almost always means an oversized, inefficient system.
- System size matters more than system type: an oversized unit short-cycles, dehumidifies poorly, costs more to buy, is noisier and runs less efficiently than a correctly sized one.
- A correctly sized reverse-cycle split system heats and cools most Passive Houses very well — not because it's the cheapest option, but because the engineering supports it.
- Evaporative cooling relies on an open, uncontrolled airflow path through the home, which directly conflicts with the sealed, balanced-ventilation approach an airtight home is built around.
- Ducted reverse-cycle, bulkhead and hydronic systems can all work well in a high-performance home — provided they're designed around its actual, tested load, not standard assumptions built for conventional housing.
Jump to a section
1. The biggest mistake Australians make
“My current house has a 16kW ducted system, so the new house needs one too” is one of the most common assumptions in Australian home building — and one of the most expensive. A traditional home leaks air, has comparatively poor insulation, and needs a large system to keep up with that constant heat loss and gain. A high-performance home is a different building entirely: it loses very little heat, gains far less unwanted heat, and requires a surprisingly small system to stay comfortable.
Carrying the old sizing logic across to the new build is the single most common — and most costly — mistake we see. It leads people toward systems many times larger than the home actually needs, with all the downsides that come with oversizing (see section 2).
Illustrative only — the actual reduction in heating and cooling load depends on your specific building, but the direction is consistent: less leakage and better insulation means less heat to replace.
Not sure what your home’s envelope is actually achieving?
Book a blower door test →2. Why system size matters more than system type
A 14kW system isn’t “better” than a 5kW system. It’s only better if the building actually needs 14kW. Every home has a heating and cooling load — the amount of heat that has to be added or removed to keep it comfortable in typical conditions — determined by the envelope’s airtightness and insulation, its glazing, orientation and the local climate. That number, not habit or what the last house had, is what should size the system.
If your high-performance home only needs 2kW and you install a system sized for 14kW, the oversized unit will:
- Short cycle — turning on and off far more often than a correctly sized unit, which is harder on the equipment and less efficient.
- Dehumidify poorly — a system that reaches its target temperature quickly doesn't run long enough to properly remove moisture from the air.
- Run noisier — larger fans and compressors moving more air and refrigerant than the room actually needs.
- Operate less efficiently — most systems are least efficient at partial load, which is exactly where an oversized unit spends most of its time.
- Cost more to buy — a bigger system is a more expensive system, for a smaller job.
This is exactly where a proper heating and cooling load calculation — informed by a measured, tested airtightness result rather than an assumed one — earns its keep. A blower door test tells you what the building is actually doing, not what the drawings hoped it would do, and that number feeds directly into correctly sizing whatever system you choose.
Want a rough idea of your own home’s load before you talk to an installer?
Try the size calculator →3. Split systems: the default that fits
A reverse-cycle split system — one outdoor compressor unit connected to one or more indoor units — is, for most Passive Houses and high-performance homes, the clear starting recommendation. Not because HiPer Haus sells them, and not because they’re the cheapest option in isolation. It’s because the engineering supports it: when heating and cooling loads are as low as a well-built high-performance home’s, a correctly sized split system can comfortably do the job that a much larger, more complex system would otherwise be asked to do.
Many people assume Passive Houses require expensive, specialist heating equipment. In reality, an open-plan high-performance home can often be fully conditioned by a single well-placed, correctly sized indoor unit. Homes with several enclosed rooms, multiple levels, or a layout that limits airflow between spaces may need more than one unit, or a different distribution strategy — which is exactly what a load calculation and a conversation about your specific floor plan will clarify.
This is an educational point rather than a sales pitch: split systems tend to win on the numbers for low-load homes, but bulkheads, ducted systems and hydronic heating all remain valid choices in the right circumstances — covered below.
4. Bulkhead air conditioning explained
A bulkhead air conditioner is often assumed to be a completely different product to a wall-mounted split — it isn’t. It’s essentially the same reverse-cycle technology, just relocated and hidden:
Instead of a visible box on the wall, the indoor unit sits inside a purpose-built ceiling bulkhead and distributes air through short duct runs to discreet linear or ceiling grilles. The trade-off is a cleaner architectural finish in exchange for slightly more install complexity and cost than a standard wall unit, plus the need for an accessible ceiling void. Sizing follows exactly the same logic as any other reverse-cycle system — get the load right first.
5. Hydronic floor heating — and why it can overheat Passive Houses
Hydronic floor heating circulates warm water through pipes embedded in the slab or screed, radiating gentle heat upward. It’s a genuinely comfortable form of heating — but in a high-performance home with good solar access, it has a specific failure mode almost nobody expects: thermal lag.
A concrete floor has a lot of thermal mass. It takes hours to warm up, and hours to cool back down. In a home with generous north-facing glazing, that lag can work directly against you:
The floor was doing its job — responding to a cold morning — but by the time the sun has added its own heat on top, the slab is still releasing warmth it no longer needs to. In a leaky, poorly insulated home this rarely matters, because the building loses heat quickly enough to absorb the mismatch. In an airtight, well-insulated home, that surplus heat has nowhere to go. This doesn’t mean hydronic floor heating “doesn’t work” in a Passive House — it means it needs careful load and thermal-lag modelling against your specific glazing and orientation, not a standard sizing rule. See is underfloor heating worth it in Australia in the FAQs below.
6. Hydronic radiators
Hot water radiators respond far faster than a floor slab, since there’s comparatively little thermal mass to warm up or cool down, which avoids the overheating risk described above. They also allow genuine room-by-room control. The trade-off is cost and complexity relative to a split system: in a home whose heating and cooling load is already small, radiators are usually chosen for a specific reason — a preference for radiant comfort, a heritage or architectural fit, or whole-home distribution without visible indoor units — rather than out of necessity.
7. Ducted reverse-cycle, done right
Ducted reverse-cycle systems can work very well in high-performance homes when correctly designed. The issue is rarely the technology itself — it’s the assumptions behind the design. Many Australian ducted installations are based on standard sizing rules developed for conventional housing. Applying those same assumptions to an airtight, well-insulated home can result in oversized equipment, short cycling and unnecessary energy use — all the problems covered in section 2, at a whole-home scale.
Done properly, a ducted system for a high-performance home starts from an actual heating and cooling load calculation, uses that number to size the unit and design the ductwork, and treats zoning as something to assess rather than assume (see the FAQ on zoning below).
8. Evaporative cooling and airtight homes
Evaporative cooling is common and effective in much of Australia — but it works on a principle that’s fundamentally at odds with an airtight home. An evaporative cooler draws hot outside air across water-saturated pads, cools it through evaporation, and pushes it into the house. For that air to keep flowing and for cooling to continue, it needs somewhere to go — which means windows or doors need to stay open so the air can escape.
An airtight home is built around the opposite idea: a sealed envelope with fresh air delivered and stale air removed through a balanced MVHR system, not through open windows. The two approaches don’t just compete — they actively undermine each other:
Evaporative cooling — open loop
MVHR — balanced, closed loop
Evaporative cooling also requires a large roof penetration for the unit itself — another direct breach of the air barrier that the rest of the building has been carefully designed and detailed to maintain.
Can I use my existing evaporative cooler?
Usually, converting an existing evaporative-cooled home to a high-performance or Passive House standard involves replacing the evaporative cooler with a refrigerative air-conditioning system. This avoids the large roof penetration, reduces uncontrolled airflow, and allows the building envelope to perform as intended.
9. Comparing your options
There’s no single “best” system — the right choice depends on budget, architecture, climate and personal preference. What follows is a starting point for that conversation, not a ranking.
Most Passive Houses and open-plan high-performance homes
Usually the lowest combined purchase and running cost, given how low the load is.
Where a hidden, architectural finish matters more than upfront cost
Same technology as a split, relocated into the ceiling with short ducts.
Larger or more complex homes wanting whole-home distribution from one system
Needs a real load calculation — not conventional-housing sizing rules.
Homes prioritising radiant comfort or a specific architectural style
Faster response than floor heating; higher cost than an equivalent split.
Cooler climates with modest solar gain
Needs thermal-lag modelling in homes with strong solar gains.
Not recommended for airtight or high-performance homes
Open-loop airflow and roof penetration conflict with the sealed envelope.
Want the load calculation done properly before you choose a system?
Home Performance Assessment →Frequently asked questions
Can a Passive House be heated with one split system?
Often, yes. Because a well-built Passive House has a very low heating and cooling load, a single correctly sized reverse-cycle split system can heat and cool an open-plan home. Homes with several separate closed rooms, multiple storeys, or unusual layouts may need more than one indoor unit or a different distribution strategy — a heating and cooling load calculation for your specific plan will confirm what's needed.
Does MVHR replace air conditioning?
No. MVHR is a ventilation system — it supplies fresh, filtered air and recovers heat that would otherwise be lost, but it isn't designed to add or remove significant amounts of heat from a home. Heating and cooling still need a dedicated system, such as a reverse-cycle split, ducted unit or hydronic system, sized to the home's much smaller load.
Does MVHR cool a house?
Only marginally. Standard MVHR is not a cooling system — it doesn't have the capacity to remove meaningful heat on a hot day. Cooling still needs a dedicated system such as a reverse-cycle split, bulkhead or ducted unit.
Can you use evaporative cooling in a Passive House?
Not effectively. Evaporative cooling depends on a continuous flow of outside air passing through the home and out through open windows or doors — the opposite of the sealed, balanced-ventilation approach a Passive House relies on. It also requires a large roof penetration for the unit, which compromises the air barrier.
What size split system does a Passive House need?
It varies with climate, orientation, glazing and floor area, but it's typically far smaller than the sizing rules used for a conventional home would suggest — often only a few kW for an entire home rather than per room. A proper heating and cooling load calculation, informed by an accurate blower door result, is the only reliable way to size it.
Can you retrofit heating into an airtight home?
Yes. Split systems, bulkheads and ducted reverse-cycle systems can all be retrofitted. The main consideration is sizing the system to the home's actual load, rather than to rules of thumb developed for older, leakier housing.
Is hydronic heating still worth it?
It can be — particularly where you want the specific comfort of radiant heat, in cooler climates with modest solar gain, or where it suits the architecture. In a high-performance home with strong solar gains, hydronic floor heating especially needs careful load and thermal-lag modelling to avoid overheating.
What's the cheapest way to heat a Passive House?
In most cases, a correctly sized reverse-cycle split system has the lowest combined purchase and running cost, because the home's heating and cooling load is small and a split system's efficiency is high. Ducted and hydronic systems can still be the right choice for other reasons — zoning, aesthetics or whole-home distribution — but typically cost more to install than an equivalent-capacity split.
Can I keep my existing ducted system?
Sometimes — if it's reassessed and rebalanced for the new envelope's much lower load, rather than reused as originally designed. In many renovations, the existing ductwork and unit were sized for a leakier, less insulated building and will be significantly oversized once the envelope is upgraded.
Do I need zoning?
Usually less than you'd think. Zoning exists to manage large temperature differences between rooms in a leaky, poorly insulated home. In a high-performance home, temperatures are naturally more even throughout, which reduces — though doesn't always eliminate — the need for zoning.
Can I use my existing evaporative cooler?
Usually, converting an existing evaporative-cooled home to a high-performance or Passive House standard involves replacing the evaporative cooler with a refrigerative air-conditioning system. This avoids the large roof penetration, reduces uncontrolled airflow and allows the building envelope to perform as intended.
Is underfloor heating worth it in Australia?
It depends heavily on climate and solar design. In cooler parts of southern Australia with limited solar gain, hydronic underfloor heating can deliver excellent, even comfort. In homes with high solar gains — large north-facing glazing, for example — the floor's thermal lag can cause overheating well after the heating is no longer needed. See the hydronic floor heating section above for the detail.
Related articles
Written by
Jonathen HindryFounder of HiPer Haus. 25+ year plumber turned Certified Passive House Tradesperson — blower door testing, MVHR design and heat pump hot water across Adelaide and South Australia.